|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-07-2012, 11:11 AM | #1 | ||
Forum Director
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 5,741
|
Driving in to Tuggerah on old Pac HWY, & found a mbl speed camera on the side of the road. It was still there on way home.
I don't remember seeing any mention of this section being listed as a blackspot, nor to the best of my knowledge having a history of speed related crashes. Did a check on the NSW RTA website to find that they have added another "500" High risk blackspot areas to their "hit lists". Be VERY aware that whilst the RTA are removing one or two of the 128 fixed emplacements, they have ramped up the usage of moblie camera enforcement on a grand scale. The review of fixed camera locations has recommended the removal of a number of 'fixed emplacements' due to the fact that there has been a 'provable' increase in the volume of injuries(and in some cases deaths) where the cameras were installed. The report identified 38 locations where fixed speed cameras were not delivering the expected road safety benefit to the community. It also indicated that "may" have been other methods of improving road safety in the area OTHER than thru punitive speed enforcement. There has been precious little publicity / public consultation provided about the increase mobile enforcement. The 'new & improved' mobile devices can pop up just about anywhere. They are administered and operated by "a third party who is a private contractor". As these mobile devices are transient, there will no longer be any tracable figures that can be used to review the true road safety effectiveness of these "deterents". Outside contractor, transient / random nature of mobile enforcement - rings alarm bells to me about how accurate any data / statistics are likely to be. |
||