|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-10-2011, 08:39 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 108
|
My brother in law bought a Commodore Sportwagon for him and his family last week.
He said he considered the Mondeo wagon but was told by the Holden dealer that the load space of the Commodore is actually bigger than the Mondeo, despite the fact that Ford advertises that the Mondeo wagon has the larger boot. He said that they measure the load capacity by measuring from the floor to the bottom of the rear window, and as the Sportwagon has its window set lower, it cops a reduced capacity by this measure, but in reality it has the bigger space when measured to the roof (which is what most people would think it should be). This sounds like salesman bulldust to me, but does anyone have any info on this? |
||
05-10-2011, 10:09 PM | #2 | ||
XR5T
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NT
Posts: 23
|
I have both a Mondeo wagon and a Commodore wagon at work.
The Mondeo has smuch more usable space, by a mile.. |
||
06-10-2011, 01:41 AM | #3 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
I don't know how they calculate load volumes but the Mondeo does have far more usable space.
__________________
MB Mondeo TDCi wagon, sea grey, on MAK Invidia 16" wheels. |
|||
06-10-2011, 10:00 AM | #4 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 917
|
Quote:
apstar |
|||
06-10-2011, 10:48 AM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane North
Posts: 1,994
|
Looks like the holden salesman did his job very well. Its a shame, as his Commondore would be worth 30% in 5 years and the mondeo diesel would likely hold its value better over time as well.
on a side note, Given the number of LX TDCi Wagons im seeing with company logos plastered all over them, im saying the LX wagon might have snuck into the slot vacated by the Falcon wagon, quite well. About the same price using half the fuel..... |
||
06-10-2011, 11:16 AM | #6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 533
|
Sorry to hijack but how does the Mondeo wagon compare to a Falcon Wagon in terms of space?
I am considering a Mondeo to replace my Falcon wagon - geez even the Mondeo hatch I looked at had a lot of space - haven't compared with a Mondeo wagon yet tho... |
||
06-10-2011, 11:23 AM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane North
Posts: 1,994
|
Falcon was designed to carry lots of everything, it was wide, and had an almost vertical boot. the Mondeo wagon, has lots of usable space, but, if you regularly filled to the brim your Falcon, it wont all fit in the Mondeo (with a luggage screen/net/cage) However, if you found that you often had excess space, or got a bit creative with your packing options when fully loaded, it would very likely still work and fit everything in.
It is a massive boot, and for most of the time, it will fit in everything you need. I dont have one, but i really do want one, and will lease one when my Pajero ends its lease. Just comes down to timing... Dont want to 2 leases at the same time.... but still gotta get the mrs an awesome car |
||
06-10-2011, 01:10 PM | #8 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 533
|
Quote:
Would be tempted by an XR5 if they had Auto's! |
|||
06-10-2011, 04:49 PM | #9 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 917
|
Quote:
apstar |
|||
06-10-2011, 08:09 PM | #10 | ||
Tippy-tronic Free Zone
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 897
|
Would be tempted by an XR5 if they had Auto's!
The exact opposite reason I bought an XR5...no Auto !!! Would've been a wagon, but FordOz didn't bring in any MB Titanium 2.5T manual wagons. Re Mondeo Vs Commodore, I was accosted by a Commodore driver in the shops carpark recently, and he grumbled a bit about GMH quality, and was only put off the Mondeo by front wheel drive (but he was reconsidering his own response on that qstn...). You could hear his brain ticking over....hmmmmm |
||
06-10-2011, 08:17 PM | #11 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 11,647
|
Quote:
I don't have anything against manuals, but I just hate having to go up and down through gears. I don't see a point to it. Especially in traffic. I prefer to let the car do it. Eventually when I sell the Mondeo, the next car will be auto. |
|||
07-10-2011, 10:08 AM | #12 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 533
|
Quote:
The new Ecoboost Mondeo comes in Auto - might go alright... |
|||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|