Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Focus

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2007, 06:11 PM   #1
zetec1 2005
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13
Default Was surprised by this...

I was surprised by findings here...
http://westnet.drive.com.au/Editoria...eID=40283&vf=1

Focus was second slowest out of all of these on the uphill run!!!

zetec1 2005 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-10-2007, 07:17 PM   #2
jweb
radio off =save petrol :P
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northernbeaches(NSW)
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zetec1 2005
I was surprised by findings here...
http://westnet.drive.com.au/Editoria...eID=40283&vf=1

Focus was second slowest out of all of these on the uphill run!!!
Wouldnt listen to a Word of that,that is the LS anyway theres been an update.
__________________
Better roads,and better planned infrastructure=higher speed limit :
jweb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-10-2007, 06:59 PM   #3
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyweb
Wouldnt listen to a Word of that,that is the LS anyway theres been an update.
not to the engine or gearbox there hasn't
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-10-2007, 07:51 PM   #4
jweb
radio off =save petrol :P
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northernbeaches(NSW)
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
not to the engine or gearbox there hasn't
I am aware of that,but the article states some of the bad points for the focus being the available saftey equipment.Since the update The Focus has these as options,as for the engine i do not agree with the article,there are too many factors that may have affected times.
__________________
Better roads,and better planned infrastructure=higher speed limit :
jweb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-10-2007, 10:38 PM   #5
eXtremist
2007 Ford Focus Zetec
 
eXtremist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Default

I am surprised they didn't include the Suzuki Swift in that review.
eXtremist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-10-2007, 11:33 PM   #6
BlackLS
yum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,417
Default

Auto + no torque till 2500-3000rpm won't be good for 0-100 up hill.

Try the same in a manual and see what happens
__________________
2005 LS Focus LX
Nov05 | Manual | Black Sapphire
250,000kms.

BlackLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 08:12 AM   #7
BrisVegas
Noobie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 525
Default

Yeah, anyone buying a compact car with auto transmission is not buying it as a hillclimb racer. Let's be honest here, the Focus (non-XR5) is not a sports car. I love mine and it's fun to drive as it handles beautifully, but it's not that quick. However, it happily pulls up the Toowoomba range with my family on board without the need to paddle the gears and it covers most other hills in 5th gear with cruise control on. There's more to life than 0-100km/h.
__________________
BrisVegas
WS Fiesta Zetec 3dr
NM Pajero TD LWB
LS Focus Zetec 5dr - gone
WS Fiesta Zetec 5dr - gone
BrisVegas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 09:21 AM   #8
raymon81
Regular Member
 
raymon81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 188
Default

Nicely put BrisVegas, it's not all about the 0-100km/h.

This test is a load of . This sounds more like a safety test rather then an overall verdict on which car is actually better. All im reading is which car has stability control and curtain airbags and thats how they are judging each vehicle. I test drove the Corolla and nothing has changed from the previous model, still very plain and boring but cheap to run. Mazda3, Golf and Civic are good but the rest of the group are crap and for them to put the Elantra, Astra and Corolla ahead of the Focus says alot about this test.
__________________
Lowered 30-35mm King springs, Custom leather interior, Polished standard 17s rims, Cadance monoblock amplifier and Alpine Type S sub woofer, clear reverse+fog+tail lights, Angel eyes and a few CHROMEEEEEE bits on my baby.
raymon81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 09:47 AM   #9
jweb
radio off =save petrol :P
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northernbeaches(NSW)
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raymon81
Nicely put BrisVegas, it's not all about the 0-100km/h.

This test is a load of . This sounds more like a safety test rather then an overall verdict on which car is actually better. All im reading is which car has stability control and curtain airbags and thats how they are judging each vehicle. I test drove the Corolla and nothing has changed from the previous model, still very plain and boring but cheap to run. Mazda3, Golf and Civic are good but the rest of the group are crap and for them to put the Elantra, Astra and Corolla ahead of the Focus says alot about this test.
The Focus has an NCAP rating of 5 stars,Wouldnt listen to the article at all it is a load of.The Focus in comparison to its competitors it reasonably sporty.
__________________
Better roads,and better planned infrastructure=higher speed limit :
jweb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 08:49 PM   #10
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

The NCAP 5 star rating actually only applies when the side and curtain airbags are fitted. This is available now on LT model with safety pack but wasn't an option when I bought mine (LS Zetec). Ford were a bit cheeky advertising the NCAP rating previously.

The acceleration thing still puzzles me. Sure its not a hill climb racer but neither is the mazda 3. The mazda is only 14kgs lighter and with 1 extra kW (108 v 107) but has 3Nm less torque than the Focus and both peak at 4500rpm. The gear ratios are also very similar, with the focus being slightly higher in every gear.

So how the hell does it do the 0 to 100 hillclimb in 14 sec when the focus takes 17 ? Its the differential here that puzzles me not the absolute time by the way.

There must be a massive difference in the torque curve below 4500. Anyone else got an explanation????? I did notice the mazda max power was at 6500 rpm v the focus' at 6000rpm. Is that it???? Holds longer in lower gear??? 1 less gear change on the way to 100???? I wouldn't have thought that would make 3 secs difference.
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 08:53 PM   #11
jweb
radio off =save petrol :P
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: northernbeaches(NSW)
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
The NCAP 5 star rating actually only applies when the side and curtain airbags are fitted. This is available now on LT model with safety pack but wasn't an option when I bought mine (LS Zetec). Ford were a bit cheeky advertising the NCAP rating previously.

The acceleration thing still puzzles me. Sure its not a hill climb racer but neither is the mazda 3. The mazda is only 14kgs lighter and with 1 extra kW (108 v 107) but has 3Nm less torque than the Focus and both peak at 4500rpm. The gear ratios are also very similar, with the focus being slightly higher in every gear.

So how the hell does it do the 0 to 100 hillclimb in 14 sec when the focus takes 17 ? Its the differential here that puzzles me not the absolute time by the way.

There must be a massive difference in the torque curve below 4500. Anyone else got an explanation????? I did notice the mazda max power was at 6500 rpm v the focus' at 6000rpm. Is that it???? Holds longer in lower gear??? 1 less gear change on the way to 100???? I wouldn't have thought that would make 3 secs difference.
Yes i read that,but still its an option.
__________________
Better roads,and better planned infrastructure=higher speed limit :
jweb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 09:05 PM   #12
Piotr
Non-Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

The Mazda 3 has VVT. Fatter torque spread
Piotr is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-10-2007, 10:47 PM   #13
BlackLS
yum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotr
The Mazda 3 has VVT. Fatter torque spread
Not sure if it has it on the 2.0 tho? I thought it was only on the SP23
__________________
2005 LS Focus LX
Nov05 | Manual | Black Sapphire
250,000kms.

BlackLS is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-10-2007, 02:14 PM   #14
pupmeister
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
Default

I just had a glance through this test again (This article appeared in a earlier thread)

The author of this article does not seem to know how to compare various vesicles and does not even seem to have a very clear understanding of vechicles. For instance he is using the automatic Ford and comparing it various manual versions. In this type of car, the automatic version is always going to be down on power.

He also vary proud to point out that the Ford is manufactured in South Africa, but he seems to forget to tell you that both the VW and the Toyota are also manufactured in South Africa.

To do true performance comparisons, you have to use similar cars with similar gearboxes and engines to get any fare comparisons. Besides the automatic for the Ford he also uses a 1.6 liter version of the VW, which again would totally skew the results of the test.

Cheers
Pupmeister
pupmeister is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-10-2007, 04:14 PM   #15
raymon81
Regular Member
 
raymon81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 188
Default

Just picked up on another thing this fool wrote in the focus review....

"The audio system has no auxiliary input and the crease in the dash reflects badly in direct sunlight."

Doesn't all the range come with the auxiliary input in the glove box so u can plug the ipod/mp3 player in?
__________________
Lowered 30-35mm King springs, Custom leather interior, Polished standard 17s rims, Cadance monoblock amplifier and Alpine Type S sub woofer, clear reverse+fog+tail lights, Angel eyes and a few CHROMEEEEEE bits on my baby.
raymon81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL