Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-10-2009, 12:45 AM   #31
Fireblade
Wizard Member
 
Fireblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Eastern Victoria
Posts: 3,999
Default

Never said it needed a competitor, and it is good that it doesn't because then ford can supply something nobody else has
__________________
Frosty and FPR - Bathurst winners 2013
Fireblade is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 12:59 AM   #32
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

I would place the GT-E/F6-E as direct competition for the HSV Senator.
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 03:41 AM   #33
FPV GTHO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Sharing his knowledge of performance exhaust setups for the NA 6 cyc Barra Falcon from BA to FG. 
Default

Cant see it happening. As ive said before, Ford would still be heavily involved in V8 development whether they marketed one or not. FPV simply does not have the resources to take on everything for the V8. Ford would also be interested in getting the V8 back into the utes and available through the range, particularly having a V8 one tonner available.
FPV GTHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 10:00 AM   #34
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

It would be a shame to drop the XR nameplate (wether 6 or 8). I think it has large brand recognition within the general public whereas no-one knows what the hell a "GS" is except some of you blokes from the 70's.

I think Ford/FPV keep making this mistake over and over and over.

They build up a simple easily recognisable brand name then drop it - I'm a big Ford fan but I struggle to recognise all these complicated initals - what the hell is a FPV F6-E. It just means nothing to me.

Your in a conversation and you say - "Oh hi I own a FPV F6-E". It just sounds absolutly stupid. Senator, Clubsport and GTS are all instantly recognisable names in comparison.

XR8 sales are down simply due to the engine - like it or not it has the PERCEPTION of being a big heavy boat anchor. Get the Coyote in there and I think things would turn around (especially if it was supercharged).

Supercharged V8's from XR8 to GT with internal differences and lower boost in the XR8 - this could easily be done for the price charged on an XR8 ($45K to $50K) - other brands can acheive forced induction performance cars for less than this - Lancer Ralliart, WRX, Golf GTi - hell even XR6T proved that. I know if I was looking and had the choice between an N/A SS and a supercharged XR8 for the same money it would be a no brainer. Ford will be too scared of Holden and too conservative as usual though.
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 10:23 AM   #35
JPFS1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JPFS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community. 
Default

Unless Ford take a much more dominant position in the ownership of FPV, then they will continue with their own V8 lineup.

Put simply, and for various reasons, if there's no Ford V8, there's no FPV V8.
JPFS1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 10:33 AM   #36
King Nothing
He has, the Knack..
 
King Nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPFS1
Unless Ford take a much more dominant position in the ownership of FPV, then they will continue with their own V8 lineup.

Put simply, and for various reasons, if there's no Ford V8, there's no FPV V8.
I agree. If ford do not need to engineer the falcon for a V8, as there is no V8 in their line-up, then FPV do not have the resources to do so. FPV need a falcon that is already designed for a V8. And I can't see ford wanting to do all the development, testing, etc for a product they don't sell. The only way it would work would be if ford and FPV become more ingrained. But that would defeat the purpose of FPV anyway.

I think the GS was simply made to help shift a few boss V8s before coyote comes in. Ford/FPV would have been looking at sales figures for V8s versus what they need to sell and saw a deficit. I could be wrong, but that makes more sense to me than the V8 falcon vanishing (again), leaving FPV with the majority of costs.

GeckoGT, while I agree that the XR name has lost some credibility, I don't think it's entirely a bad thing. Selling more XRs as opposed to XTs means ford are making more money per car.
__________________
2010 BF MKIII Falcon wagon "EGO"

Workhorse, stock as a rock

2004 BA MKI Futura - Now the wife's

For Show: 18" Kaotic Shadow Chrome, King SL all round, Cadence Amp, Kenwood 12" Sub, JL Audio 5x7's, Scuff Plates, MP3 Connector

For Go: SVI LPG, K&N Filter, F6 CAI, XR6T snorkle, XR8 catback, Magnaflow metal cat, Pacemaker headers, Underdrive, Thermostat, Custom tune, DBA4000

Now with baby seat and toys


175.6 rwkw

www.bseries.com.au/King_Nothing
King Nothing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 11:46 AM   #37
geckoGT
Ich bin ein auslander
 
geckoGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always level headed and i notice him being the voice of reason when a thread may be getting heated 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
I agree. If ford do not need to engineer the falcon for a V8, as there is no V8 in their line-up, then FPV do not have the resources to do so. FPV need a falcon that is already designed for a V8. And I can't see ford wanting to do all the development, testing, etc for a product they don't sell. The only way it would work would be if ford and FPV become more ingrained. But that would defeat the purpose of FPV anyway.

I think the GS was simply made to help shift a few boss V8s before coyote comes in. Ford/FPV would have been looking at sales figures for V8s versus what they need to sell and saw a deficit. I could be wrong, but that makes more sense to me than the V8 falcon vanishing (again), leaving FPV with the majority of costs.

GeckoGT, while I agree that the XR name has lost some credibility, I don't think it's entirely a bad thing. Selling more XRs as opposed to XTs means ford are making more money per car.

Your first paragraph probably states more clearly what I was trying to say, the model shifting will require Ford and FPV to be more integrated for it to be viable from a business perspective. This will make FPV just a part of Ford and not the seperate entity they really need to lose the "kitted up falcon" feel about their product.

I agree with you that it is good they are selling more cars on the back of the XR6 sales success. However this is not a good thing from the performance car buyer perspective, XR6 fleet sales make the name nothing special. This is to a point that some clubs have select membership to XR and FPV series cars, but why XR6 when it really is no longer the performance Ford, it just looks like one? I am sorry but this really is another example of Ford spending time and money building a brand image and then watering it down to nothing.

Personally, I would prefer they protect the XR name and keep FPV special. Heres how I as a Ford enthusiast would like to see it happen.

Keep FPV out of all fleet and police sales.

Keep the XR6T and XR8 in the Ford range as the Ford high performance models.

With the introduction of the coyote, seriously investigate the value in creating a G6E V8 to run alongside the G6ET.

Back to ducking for cover now!
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional!
geckoGT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 12:08 PM   #38
DJR-351
I am Groot
Donating Member3
 
DJR-351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
Default

If FoA dropped the V8 from it's range then how would this affect the V8SC??

I know the connection between the road going car and the track car is tenuous at best, but surely this would have to sound the death knell for the Falcon v Holden V8's....

Unless as mentioned Ford/FPV become a more intergrated company....
__________________
..
McLaren F1
Dick Johnson Racing

"Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe
DJR-351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 12:18 PM   #39
Quasi
Boss 290 BA GT Goodness
 
Quasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 2,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damozxr6
hope u guys are wrong!
Yeah, means I'll NEVER own a new Ford v8. Even if I could afford a friggin' FPV I have more important things to put my money into.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Sheene on a V8 Supercar telecast
Welcome to beautiful Phillip Island.....gateway to hypothermia
The Toy - 03 BA GT In 'Venom', Silver BF Stripe Kit, Non-Premium Sound, Cloth Trim, Auto, 19" Staggered Vertini, Custom Exhaust, Roof DVD

Member of the FPV & XR Owners Club of ACT

Web Links To Check Out

Shannons Club Garage

Facebook Photo Albums
Quasi is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 06:24 PM   #40
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85

And with a 5.8L coyote (XR8/GS) and the 6.2L Boss (GT) it would seem an ideal sort of V8 lineup. Since the Boss seems to have far more potential with a DOHC Frankenstein job (unlike the 5.4 boss, not saying it's bad, just couldve been better).
Despite what some magazines might write there is no such 5.8 version of the Coyote. It simply does not exist.

And the 6.2 is truck only, with only Super Duty F series and the SVT Raptor using it.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 06:28 PM   #41
irlewy86
Meep Meep
 
irlewy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
Default

I just don't see the point in dropping a model when a new engine is coming on deck. I can see the dillema Ford has but surely its worth while giving the Coyote a go. If it still doesn't pick up give it the boot then.
__________________
Thundering on....
irlewy86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 07:07 PM   #42
TUF_302
The Vengeful One
Donating Member1
 
TUF_302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,762
Default

How can the GS replace the XR8 when its a limited release?
__________________
TUF_302 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 13-10-2009, 11:01 PM   #43
tezxr8man
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 770
Default

Ford since the Ba have turned the XR series into a watered down lame version of what it 1nce stood for affordable performance why wouldnt ford have a base model V8 like back in the day it worked in the EL the base V8 and 6 then the XR's then the GT why is it so hard when its so obvious.
Give the XR's more power and exclusivity and wind the wick up again for the F6 and GT

Ford have killed what the XR brand stood for like the Fairlane by making it boring
tezxr8man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 02:15 PM   #44
JutroXR8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 805
Default

Who cares if the XR8 was no longer in the Ford stable. It'll just go back to the days when Tickford did all the XR8's and T-series/GT's vehicles. People still purchased the XR8 and the T-Series/GT's.
__________________
FGF6 Vic Number Plates for sale! PM if interested.


FGX XR8, Auto, Black.

WG Fiesta ST Manual, Black.
JutroXR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 02:32 PM   #45
R-Design
Guess Who's Back?
 
R-Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default Ford commits to V8 future... for now

I think this is the article some have mentioned earlier:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarPoint
"However, the V8 still has its place and we're not going to change anything as far as the V8 line-up is concerned. The things we're doing with FPV is about a different kind of performance, branded under the FPV brand as opposed to the customer that buys the XR8. Particularly the XR8 in Utes, lifestyle vehicles, and even some XR8s in the sedan, but it's really the lifestyle utes that attract the V8 buyer."
http://carpoint.com.au/news/2009/lar...-for-now-16640
__________________
The 18th Letter
R-Design is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 02:43 PM   #46
Joe5619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tezxr8man
why wouldnt ford have a base model V8 like back in the day it worked in the EL the base V8 and 6 then the XR's then the GT why is it so hard when its so obvious.
Probably becuase "back in the day" of EL Ford sold 95K Falcons a year, now they are luck to sell 30K!! People are not buying Falcons like they once use to!! A V8 in base XT model would be a complete watse of time, space & money in the year 2009 IMO!!
Joe5619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 03:14 PM   #47
T3ts50
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
T3ts50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default

Does anyone know how much it costs to insure a GS over an XR8. I'm only guessing here but with an FPV badge on it, it might be considerably more. I know of a few people who have choosen an SSV over a Clubbie for this very reason.
T3ts50 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 03:40 PM   #48
onfire
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,078
Default

I don't think any internal factors, such as damaging the XR brand name through making it a mainstream product is the problem, if there is one at all.

Think green, think the perceptions that have been pumped down people's throats for the last 5 or 6 years about bigger cars, emissions and global warming, if anything is damaging the V8 image and brand names in general, it would be the work of climate change scar tactics.

I think making the XR series mainstream with the BA series was a good idea, to me, the XR series is the sports sedan of the common people, along with Holden's SS.

With the GS being a limited run, I always thought the idea was to offer a FPV option on an XR8 or similar budget.
__________________
FOR SALE: 2 0 0 3 F A L C O N X R 8
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...31#post5041431


onfire is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 03:57 PM   #49
Serial_Fool
Whipper Snappa
 
Serial_Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SA
Posts: 1,192
Default

By comparison all the V8 Falcons since the originial BA falcon have been dwarfed by equivilent turbo 6 in every sense apart from the V8 sound coming from the exhaust. Sales have suffered accordingly with Ford refusing to improve upon the engine any further for over 6 years. V8 fans with no particular allegence have gone with Holden.

Put a v8 engine faster than the turbo 6/ holden v8 into the XR8/GT and see the improvement in sales. The v8 will become the halo car of the range again just like it always has been with Holden/hsv.

V8s still resonate with people, just check out the numbers of v8s Holden are selling.
__________________
*insert witty quote*
Serial_Fool is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 04:17 PM   #50
GTpilot
FG GT 5.4 w/ additions!
 
GTpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sunny SE Melbourne
Posts: 2,105
Default

Perhaps the XR8 is being ditched as suggested and the entry level FPV will be the GT-H (H for Hack) :
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by prasac
googoo gaga whoops sorry i thought this was the let's be whiny babies thread
GTpilot is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 04:31 PM   #51
LTDterri
SY TS Territory
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 596
Default

I know it costs the company a lot but why can you not offer a V8 accross the entire range...sure there will be a price premium but those who really want one will pay that price. no sports V8 (XR8) no luxury V8 (G6E), no V8 ute, no LWB V8 (fairlane,LTD), so where do the punters go to find these type of vehicles....you guessed it the Red team, they seem to be able to offer them. BAD IDEA FORD
LTDterri is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 04:34 PM   #52
FTE217
T3/Sprint8
Donating Member2
 
FTE217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,112
Default

or GT-Has Been........
__________________
Tickfords T3/TS50 '02
Sprint8 manual Sept 24 '16
Daily Macan GTS
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Abraham Lincoln"
FTE217 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 05:22 PM   #53
mininote
*** SPRINTY ***
 
mininote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3ts50
Does anyone know how much it costs to insure a GS over an XR8. I'm only guessing here but with an FPV badge on it, it might be considerably more. I know of a few people who have choosen an SSV over a Clubbie for this very reason.
my FPV GS cost $502 per annum for full insurance (incl. windscreen replacement option, no hire car or other option though) thats pretty cheap i thought, im 38, full NCB fwiw
__________________
FORD FG-X XR8 SPRINT build no.495
mininote is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 05:33 PM   #54
08GHIA
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Thats why heard recently, just traded by BF Ghia on new FPV GS, had it for a week and loving it! Black 6sp manual 302kw
08GHIA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 05:49 PM   #55
mininote
*** SPRINTY ***
 
mininote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 08GHIA
Thats why heard recently, just traded by BF Ghia on new FPV GS, had it for a week and loving it! Black 6sp manual 302kw
welcome to GS club : awfully addictive aint it!!
__________________
FORD FG-X XR8 SPRINT build no.495
mininote is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 08:18 PM   #56
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,797
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JutroXR8
Who cares if the XR8 was no longer in the Ford stable. It'll just go back to the days when Tickford did all the XR8's and T-series/GT's vehicles. People still purchased the XR8 and the T-Series/GT's.
But if it goes alon the lines of the GS model, your gonna pay an extra 10k for a V8 cause it has an FPV badge.
__________________
Daniel
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 08:25 PM   #57
FPV8U
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
 
FPV8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,895
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3ts50
Does anyone know how much it costs to insure a GS over an XR8. I'm only guessing here but with an FPV badge on it, it might be considerably more. I know of a few people who have choosen an SSV over a Clubbie for this very reason.
Agreed a mate of mine has a VZ R8 & His insurance is worse than mine and my driving history isn't exactly straight... and his is 100% Clear.
FPV8U is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 09:33 PM   #58
big_landau
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJR-351
If FoA dropped the V8 from it's range then how would this affect the V8SC??

I know the connection between the road going car and the track car is tenuous at best, but surely this would have to sound the death knell for the Falcon v Holden V8's....

Unless as mentioned Ford/FPV become a more intergrated company....
makes you wonder as i thought v8 supercars were based on the falcon xr8 and the ss crumpledoor?
big_landau is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-10-2009, 11:54 PM   #59
SSD-85
I ♥ EDM
Donating Member1
 
SSD-85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Despite what some magazines might write there is no such 5.8 version of the Coyote. It simply does not exist.

And the 6.2 is truck only, with only Super Duty F series and the SVT Raptor using it.

It has been pointed out the coyote theorectically supports displacements of 5.8L. And the 5.4 block in aust. fords is the US truck block. Im sure Ford aus. can repeat it with the 6.2L.....
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-10-2009, 11:15 PM   #60
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85
It has been pointed out the coyote theorectically supports displacements of 5.8L. And the 5.4 block in aust. fords is the US truck block. Im sure Ford aus. can repeat it with the 6.2L.....
5.4 was never truck only, as shown by the GT500 and Cobra R.

6.2 is truck only, will not be used in passenger vehicles. Too big, too heavy, which won't fix the current Boss's handling problems.

Next years line up will be 5 litre only in NA and SC forms.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL