|
|
|
|
|
13-06-2014, 09:51 PM
|
#31 | ||
|
Render unto Caesar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,231
|
More info
http://jalopnik.com/the-2015-mustang...nds-1590194961 The weights will be: 3517 (1598kg) (i4) 3526 (1602kg) (V6) vs 3501 (2014) 3704 (1683kg) (V8) vs 3618 (2014) oh and ready for configuring. http://bp3.ford.com/2015-Ford-Mustang
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson |
||
|
|
|
14-06-2014, 09:44 AM
|
#32 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,174
|
2015 Ecoboost Manual: 3517 Lbs (1595 Kg) ..... (convertable. 3642)
2015 Ecoboost Automatic: 3512........ (conv. 3661) 2015 V6 Manual: 3526 (conv. 3644) 2015 V6 Automatic: 3529 (conv. 3654) 2015 GT Manual: 3704 Lbs (1680 Kg) (convert. 3825) 2015 GT Automatic: 3727 (1690.5 Kg) .....(convert. 3852) From a dealer manual: |
||
|
|
|
|
14-06-2014, 12:12 PM
|
#33 | ||
|
Peter Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
|
So the V8 will be about 40kg heavier?
That's pretty minimal considering. Still about 170kg lighter than an FPV GT. Too bad it didn't lose the weight like the earlier claims said, but they have done reasonably well to get the weight gain minimal considering the addition of IRS and all the new tech. If anything the extra weight of the IRS at the rear may help balance it out a bit better. |
||
|
|
|
| This user likes this post: |
|
14-06-2014, 01:12 PM
|
#34 | ||
|
love the quad cams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Baulkham Hills
Posts: 1,490
|
i'll take a 170kg reduction any day
|
||
|
|
|
|
14-06-2014, 01:34 PM
|
#35 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,801
|
1598 kg's for the Ecoboost looks good to me. About 240 kg's lighter than my former SC GT-P and a whopping 400+ kg's lighter than my SRT8. I going to need a bigger garage
|
||
|
|
|
|
14-06-2014, 02:39 PM
|
#36 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
Should still be fairly nippy at those weights, final drive ratios and gearing will be interesting.
|
||
|
|
|
|
14-06-2014, 05:17 PM
|
#37 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,174
|
Regardless of the weight gain, Ford have stated that the new (S550) GT is Quicker than the current 444Hp (331Kw) N/A BOSS 302 - which does 0-100K in 4.0 sec. Yes...4.0 seconds.
Even the current (outgoing) S197 base NA 5.0 GT does low-mid 4s 0-100klm (4.3 sec 0-60Mph) Quote:
Last edited by stevefreestyle; 14-06-2014 at 05:23 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
| This user likes this post: |
|
17-06-2014, 05:31 PM
|
#38 | ||
|
Ute Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
|
Motor Trend is BS, they subtract roll-out from their 0-60 times.
|
||
|
|
|
Re: 2015 Mustang to Gain Weight?
Linear Mode
