|
|
28-04-2017, 02:05 PM | #1 | ||
Cabover nut
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Onsite Eastcoast
Posts: 10,790
|
I seem to remember you bought a house to live in, you bought a car to drive, you bought a caravan to holiday in not something you just flip for a profit.
I wonder what ever happened to doing a decent days work.
__________________
heritagestonemason.com/Fordlouisvillerestoration In order that the labour of centuries past may not be in vain during the centuries to come...... D. Diderot 1752
|
||
This user likes this post: |
28-04-2017, 02:11 PM | #2 | |||
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,473
|
Quote:
But, living basics like shelter should be left out of it. I dont think housing should be made affordable so everyone can buy a home, fact will always be you need a steady job/income to maintain one. Im also over people saying how the cities are so expensive, pretty simple, dont live there. We just need jobs moved out of the cities and it would solve half the issue.
__________________
|
|||
28-04-2017, 09:48 PM | #3 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 548
|
Quote:
Micheal Caton wold be proud |
|||
29-04-2017, 02:23 PM | #4 | ||
Cabover nut
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Onsite Eastcoast
Posts: 10,790
|
Makes me glad to live in the country. How's that serenity, dals.
__________________
heritagestonemason.com/Fordlouisvillerestoration In order that the labour of centuries past may not be in vain during the centuries to come...... D. Diderot 1752
|
||
This user likes this post: |
28-04-2017, 08:13 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,321
|
Even if house prices drop, they will increase again eventually.
Just need to buy during the drop if you can |
||
28-04-2017, 08:18 PM | #6 | |||
Budget Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,418
|
Quote:
*Coughs* JAPAN *Coughs*
__________________
12.1@112Mph 285rwkw on n2o Cleveland Power |
|||
28-04-2017, 09:23 PM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 548
|
|
||
29-04-2017, 07:38 PM | #8 | |||
Budget Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,418
|
Quote:
The idea that property always increases in value after a correction was not the Japanese experience. It could easily happen here...
__________________
12.1@112Mph 285rwkw on n2o Cleveland Power |
|||
29-04-2017, 09:42 PM | #9 | ||
I am Groot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
|
Actually statistics last year showed that for the first time in 25 years more people moved to NZ from Aus than left NZ for Australia, the majority of those leaving Aus for NZ where Kiwis moving back home....
|
||
28-04-2017, 08:18 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,349
|
For me a house is for you to live in, not an investment but I tell you what I am regretting not getting in on it at this point since I still have not bought yet
Canberra has hit $700k median house price. I've been looking for sometime now and it is not uncommon to have 30-50 people at some open houses. I can only imagine how bad Sydney and Melbourne is. |
||
29-04-2017, 10:06 PM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,321
|
|
||
28-04-2017, 09:14 PM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 548
|
Here is a simple easy to way for the govt to start the ball rolling. Outlaw interest free loans, this is almost exclusively used by investors.
Unfortunately as others have said any subsidy the government puts into play for more affordable housing only pushes prices up. History is never wrong. For those that wish for a correction I can imagine that a whole new bunch of cashed up investors will be quite happy to take up the slack. Those with money in shares will just swap over to real estate. I know that's what I will do, and don't forget for all this to happen the banks will take a BIG hit so they aren't going to be offering 4% more like 8% +. So unless you have a good deposit in cash ready you may still miss out anyway Then the cycle just starts again. It sucks but that's the capitalist system. |
||
30-04-2017, 10:47 AM | #13 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,240
|
Clearence rates for both Sydney and Melbourne yesterday were 80% and 83%.
So its not flattening out or even softening at the moment. |
||
01-05-2017, 04:42 PM | #14 | ||
bitch lasagne
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sonova Beach
Posts: 15,110
|
__________________
|
||
01-05-2017, 05:33 PM | #15 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,240
|
Lets see what Turnbull and Co bring to tomorrows budget?
|
||
12-05-2017, 12:07 AM | #16 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,004
|
increased medicare levy on top of policy that forces us to take out private health cover which goes up year on year well above CPI
a tax on banks which will ultimately be passed on to customers, so its really a tax on us a savings scheme for first home buyers that does nothing to address the problem (lack of supply, too much deductability of expenses, easy access to credit for investors) this government are imbeciles |
||
3 users like this post: |
11-05-2017, 10:33 PM | #18 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 548
|
Quote:
However if you give a tax break to your company that money might just get you a new machine, a forklift, perhaps even a new truck. Sure the bossman gets a new bmw but the trickle down effect if utilized the way it is designed to creates income for more people than an individual $10 bucks ever would. Which means you get to keep your job and keep paying tax. Utopia I know but that is the way it is. |
|||
14-05-2017, 10:09 PM | #19 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-05-2017, 01:05 PM | #20 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 3,705
|
Quote:
Fact is, this trickle down tax relief has never worked. Those CEO's with their multi million dollar wages have never given me one cent! What gets me, is sheeple keep buying into this bullshizzle.
__________________
www.bseries.com.au/mercurybullet 2016 Falcon XR8. Powered by the legend that is - David Winter. XC Cobra #181. 1985 Mack Superliner, CAT 3408, 24 speed Allison. |
|||
15-05-2017, 06:33 PM | #21 | ||
FG XR6T trayback
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N-W NSW
Posts: 1,308
|
An oldy explaining tax cuts.
How Taxes Work . . . This is a VERY simple way to understand the tax laws. Read on — it does make you think!! Let’s put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men — the poorest — would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1, the sixth would pay $3, the seventh $7, the eighth $12, the ninth $18, and the tenth man — the richest — would pay $59. That’s what they decided to do. The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement — until one day, the owner threw them a curve (in tax language a tax cut). “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20.” So now dinner for the ten only cost $80.00. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six — the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his “fair share?” The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being PAID to eat their meal. So the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of his earlier $59. Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got a dollar out of the $20,” declared the sixth man who pointed to the tenth. “But he got $7!” “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man, “I only saved a dollar, too … It’s unfair that he got seven times more than me!”. “That’s true!” shouted the seventh man, “why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!” “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night he didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered, a little late what was very important. They were FIFTY-TWO DOLLARS short of paying the bill! Imagine that! And that, boys and girls, journalists and college instructors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. Where would that leave the rest? Unfortunately, most taxing authorities anywhere cannot seem to grasp this rather straightforward logic! |
||
16-05-2017, 11:13 PM | #22 | |||
Budget Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,418
|
Quote:
Yer.. Right, like that would ever happen in either scenario. I don't like paying tax and reckon I have paid way too much tax over the years, so I will play. This is an American assessment (at least 10 years old) of how their tax system works, let’s put it in an Australian context. If it was an Australian restaurant the $100 bill would divvy up like this; the first 3 men would pay nothing, the next 3 would pay $3.67, the next 3 would pay $14 and the richest would pay $47. That's our progressive tax system and the vast majority of Australians agree, "the more you earn the more tax you pay". Now the restaurant owner (government) is going to cut $20 off the bill (cut 20% off our tax) and the internet fable above asserts that giving 35% of that cut to the top 10% of tax payers is the fairest way to do it!? So in the Australian context; our government decides to give tax payers a tax cut to the tune of 35billion dollars (20% of personal income tax revenue). The fairest way to do this is to give 35% of the 35billion tax cut to the top 10% of tax payers. So just over 1 million Australians get about 12 billion between them?! And the other 95% of the population can squabble over the remaining 65%?! Does this seem fair to anyone or does it sound like someone trying to justify giving tax cuts to the most wealthy in our community? And then there is this; "Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore". So wealthy people are going to leave Australia if we tax them too much? I have paid heaps of tax in my life, don't like it but I am very happy to contribute to and live in this country (and I have lived in others). If any of the top 10% of tax payers in this country want to leave because they can get a better life style somewhere else, don't let the door hit you on the a$$ on the way out...
__________________
12.1@112Mph 285rwkw on n2o Cleveland Power |
|||
2 users like this post: |
17-05-2017, 08:42 AM | #23 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,027
|
Too much common sense printed in the press for once.
This bloke has got the self entitled victims in their twenties and thirties up in arms as the truth and a dose of reality slaps them right in the face. https://www.google.com/amp/www.9news...pending-habits |
||
This user likes this post: |
16-05-2017, 11:05 AM | #24 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Miranda, NSW
Posts: 6,771
|
Thats gold mate
__________________
2005 BA MK2 FPV GT - 6 SPEED MANUAL , SILHOUETTE, SWISSVAX, SUNROOF, BILSTEIN AND LOVELLS, FACTORY GENUINE 19'S, X-FORCE STAINLESS QUAD CATBACK, ADVANCE HEADERS, 200 CPSI CATS, BLUEPOWER CAI, HERROD BREATHER KIT, 4:11 DIFF RATIO, MAL WOOD OPT 3+ CLUTCH, BILLET SHIFTER, MELLINGS 10227, NOW WITH REVERSE CAMERA/SENSORS, ALPINE SPEAKERS & SUB - CUSTOM TUNED TO 275 RWKW NOW WITH A NEW ADDITION - 2017 MUSTANG V8 GT FASTBACK - , 6 SPEED AUTO IN PLATINUM WHITE, |
||
16-05-2017, 01:06 PM | #25 | ||
BLUE OVAL INC.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,618
|
Well clearly the 9 who beat up the rich guy weren't very smart, they should have flogged his wallet and threatened him for his PIN...
|
||
4 users like this post: |
16-05-2017, 02:49 PM | #26 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,004
|
In reality, the rich guy shows up to the restaurant in his Aston, and when the bill comes round, he pulls out $5 for his share because his accountant found a way for him to look poor on paper.
|
||
3 users like this post: |
16-05-2017, 09:51 PM | #27 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 69
|
After the budget I can't afford the restaurants - I am now on a gst free diet -
Trick is to minimize the gst when grocery shopping. I am going to sell the car and walk to work = less gst to pay. Taxed more = less money to spend. |
||
17-05-2017, 09:09 AM | #28 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,517
|
I haven't read all before, but in my opinion the real estate agents have a fair old responsibility in all this - I reckon they are the new 'used car salespeople' - ripping every one off for their own end, driving prices higher and higher, no-one has really put them under the microscope - they buy into new estates, take a lot of the land just to drive up prices
|
||
17-05-2017, 04:55 PM | #29 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 245
|
Quote:
The buyer and seller sets the price.......if there's no willing buyer, the property won't sell regardless of what the vendor (or THEIR agent) wants. Housing affordability is a combination of factors: 1. Supply and Demand...prices are higher where people want to live (currently Sydney & Melbourne). This also varies between types of properties and the popularity of Suburbs. Apartments are more affordable than houses because they are currently making more of them and they are not in short supply. 2. Available Credit.....it's been relatively easy and reasonably cheap to borrow money. If that changes, so will house prices. 3. Overseas Investment......we are seen as a solid and stable place to invest, so money has flowed in and pushed up price. But this also connects back into supply. If the supply of homes was greater than the demand, prices would fall. It's the big cities that have the supply problem and therefore the high house prices, it's not as bad in the regionals. The government needs to create more housing stock in the city by re-zoning OR encourage people to move to the regionals. Commuting around the city is becoming difficult already, so regional cities would be a better solution but jobs will need to be created. Private business will only move there if Government departments move there first (creating populations to do business with). Unfortunately first home buyers need to realise that the may need to start with something in the less desirable suburbs/areas and work their way up (and that's always been the case even 30 years ago). Without negative gearing, there would be a real shortage of private rental accommodation, it would be a disaster. Capital Gains Tax came in in 1987 and was originally discounted for inflation but became difficult to calculate so they made it apply to 50% of the gain which is a much clearer formula. Developers are not the bad guys either, they have to risk large sums of money and navigate plenty of Government red-tape to create blocks of land. When the market collapsed in the early '90's the majority of them went broke, and some never recovered. If development land was more plentiful (cheaper) there'd be more blocks for sale, more houses built, therefore less competition for each house, therefore more reasonable prices. Simple economics.....the price of anything rises when demand out-strips supply. |
|||
17-05-2017, 08:39 PM | #30 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,588
|
Quote:
The other chestnut I hear is that the govt need to release more land. Land must be developed in parcels as the cost to do so is very high, developers won't carve up every square inch of available land just so the poor people can have a block at a 40% discount, they'll go broke. Argue all you like about how many years income a house is today, 40 years ago our parents all scrimped and saved to buy in what was then underdeveloped, less desirable communities.
__________________
____________________ 2019 LDV G10 2009 Mitsubishi Express-GONE 2011 Honda Jazz ____________________ |
|||