Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-03-2016, 01:39 AM   #1
EBSXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,315
Default Back to the Future ?

I know this is pure speculation, if there were no ADRs for Emissions, Noise etc it would be interesting to know with modern technology how much extra the engineers could extract from an engine in terms of KW, NM and Economy compared to an ADR Compliant engine.
EBSXR6 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2016, 01:41 AM   #2
Venomous1
5.0 means business
 
Venomous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Busselton, Western Australia
Posts: 1,019
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

probably add 25-50 kw on Turbo Engines. Less on N/A but I've wondered this myself.
__________________
Windsor V8 Enthusiast!
Turbo Barra Lover!
Venomous1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2016, 01:47 AM   #3
EBSXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomous1 View Post
probably add 25-50 kw on Turbo Engines. Less on N/A but I've wondered this myself.
Cats are definitely a big negative.
EBSXR6 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2016, 02:41 AM   #4
Express
Bathed In A Yellow Glow
 
Express's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NSW Central Coast
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

That question is a bit like, 'how fast can a pushbike go?'
Express is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2016, 07:33 AM   #5
commodorenutt
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
commodorenutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Think back to pre-72 when ADRs started - they didn't have to work real hard to develop engines like they do these days (and have done so for the last 20 odd years).
The engines we were given (with the exception of the ones played with for Bathurst) were lazy, thirsty and unresponsive.

I think we'd be further behind than we are now. ADRs gave the development engineers a target to meet - a target that required them to design far more efficient engines - channelling millions into R&D of port design, materials, cam profiles, combustion chamber shapes etc.

Increased efficiency = more power, so the bonus to us has been power - as a byproduct of them seeking greater efficiency gains to meet ever-tightening emissions targets.

Take away that goal, and they won't have to chase it. Only supercars & homologation specials will be the winners.
commodorenutt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2016, 09:43 AM   #6
Craig@AUDI
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Craig@AUDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,045
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EBSXR6 View Post
Cats are definitely a big negative.


Craig@AUDI is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
8 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2016, 10:23 AM   #7
GasoLane
Former BTIKD
Donating Member2
 
GasoLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sunny Downtown Wagga Wagga. NSW.
Posts: 53,197
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by commodorenutt View Post
Think back to pre-72 when ADRs started - they didn't have to work real hard to develop engines like they do these days (and have done so for the last 20 odd years).
The engines we were given (with the exception of the ones played with for Bathurst) were lazy, thirsty and unresponsive.
Most cars back then worked on the 'Murrican principle of "Thar ain't no substitute fer cubic feet"
__________________
Dying at your job is natures way of saying that you're in the wrong line of work.
GasoLane is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 21-03-2016, 10:44 AM   #8
EBSXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig@Rockdale View Post
LOL I did leave myself open to that one
EBSXR6 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 21-03-2016, 09:25 PM   #9
GO FURTHER
Moderator
Donating Member3
 
GO FURTHER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,940
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Fitting New Iridium Plugs & the state of the old ones - (Photo Essay) 
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Modern technology ..... That's the beauty of electric cars... No emissions to worry about and minimal noise.
Tesla S ..... 0 - 100Km in 3 secs.... That's the future!
GO FURTHER is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2016, 02:01 AM   #10
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

You would probably see the biggest difference on turbo diesels. They would puff out black smoke when they accelerate, but they would have almost no lag, incredible power and fuel economy.
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 22-03-2016, 09:53 AM   #11
cheap
Wirlankarra yanama
 
cheap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: God's Country
Posts: 2,103
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Just look at what VW achieved when they bypassed emission laws. Better fuel economy, more power...
cheap is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 22-03-2016, 09:56 AM   #12
Jacko*
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Jacko*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gladstone Qld
Posts: 664
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EBSXR6 View Post
I know this is pure speculation, if there were no ADRs for Emissions, Noise etc it would be interesting to know with modern technology how much extra the engineers could extract from an engine in terms of KW, NM and Economy compared to an ADR Compliant engine.
That's an interesting question, but we need to narrow it down a bit. What would we likely change about a modern engine to achieve maximum output. Would we just remove all the pollution & noise controls? Would we start tinkering with the engines internals, camshaft, heads, valve springs? I recon if all we were able to change was exhaust, intake & tune with no emission requirements, 25% increase in power at maximum rpm might be achievable. But the more we would try to increase power the worse our economy would get. A free flowing exhaust & intake would only be of benefit once the limitations of the original setup have been reached, this would be in the upper rev range for most engines. More interesting than maximum power for me would be the torque curve over the entire rev range, this is where any improvements would be noticed the most (for a street driven car).
__________________
Mel's XB Coupe Build Thread
Jacko* is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 22-03-2016, 10:46 AM   #13
EBSXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAXRSIX View Post
Modern technology ..... That's the beauty of electric cars... No emissions to worry about and minimal noise.
I love the sound of a nice V8, V12 etc. Some electric cars have great performance, my brother used this analogy after being taken for a ride in a Tesla "it is like having a p***s without testicles"
EBSXR6 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 22-03-2016, 11:18 AM   #14
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,792
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap View Post
Just look at what VW achieved when they bypassed emission laws. Better fuel economy, more power...
And an investigation and law suit
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 22-03-2016, 03:37 PM   #15
FTE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
FTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Townsville North Queensland
Posts: 547
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAXRSIX View Post
Modern technology ..... That's the beauty of electric cars... No emissions to worry about !
Except for the coal fired power stations that make the invisible power which gives people the assumption there's no emissions. Then the battery disposal once it's dead
__________________
Our Tickford cars:

2001 Congo Green AU 111 XR8 sedan, manual option 2G body kit but now wears the Rebel kit

1997 EL GT Sparkling Burgundy, sunroof, auto.

Our former Tickford cars:

1997 XH11 XR8
1998 AU XR8 manual sedan
1999 AU XR8 manual ute
2002 AU XR8 auto sedan, sunroof
FTE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 23-03-2016, 01:10 AM   #16
jimt3te50
My kids think I'm cool
 
jimt3te50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 7,880
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Jim has consistently for some time now shared his life, and his passions in his XY GT and more so his FG GT in a way so everyone here feels part of the journey, which helps make AFF such a worthwhile place to be.  An outstanding contributor in my book. 
Default Re: Back to the Future ?

Look at what the aftermarket can produce from the same platforms largely without the encumberences of emissions laws etc, it's no coincidence
__________________
2011 FPV GT 335 >My Build Thread<
(Posts 3511-3515 has a compilation of most of the pics, page 118 @ 30 posts per page)
BLUESTREAK built 5.2L flat-plane-crank VOODOO with 3.2L Intercooled Kenne Bell blower, 1000rwhp/746rwkw @ 8000rpm @ 20psi on E85. Built ZF with BLUESTREAK 2C Circle D converter. Unbloodybelievable...
2018 Ford Ranger RAPTOR
2013 Audi SQ5
jimt3te50 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL