Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2008, 08:22 PM   #1
GTS_300_Coupe
Mandy Moore FTW!
 
GTS_300_Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 211
Default Do people get bigger wheels just for the aesthetics? Is there a performance benefit?

According to Mazda6tech (the man certainly *seems* to know what he's talking about) up-sizing your wheels is just for looks and you stand to lose in terms of handling and performance (especially acceleration and braking.)

Read here:
http://www.mazda6tech.com/index.php?...d=44&Itemid=50

Quote:
Plus-sizing for Dummies

Larger diameter wheels:

Larger diameter wheels bring a more prominent aesthetic touch to the car. Many Mazda6 owners choose to change out their 16" wheels for 18's, or their 17" wheels out for 19's. These large wheels are attention-getting, and can make a statement about you and your car.
Care to know what that statement is?

Aside from looks, there is really only one great reason to change to a larger wheel size: to fit larger brakes. Do you need larger brakes? If, after a day of hard driving, you can still lock your brakes- then no. And even then, you should consider swapping your brake pads before your rotors.

There are, however, many compelling reasons not to plus-size your wheels that you should be aware of before purchasing new wheels:

1. Reduced braking distances. Larger wheels, even if they weigh the same as smaller wheels, are harder to slow down. [Further reading.]

2. Reduced brake pad life. Because of #1, the brakes must work harder. Expect them to wear more quickly, or in hard driving possibly overheat and fail.

3. Reduced steering feel. Due to gyroscopic effects, larger wheels are harder to turn left and right. Thus, a slipping wheel will not transmit as immediate nor as strong of a force to be felt through the steering wheel. Running a different wheel offset changes the car's scrub radius, which can multiply this effect.

4. Reduced acceleration. Larger wheels, even if they weigh the same as smaller wheels, are harder to speed up. [Further reading.]

5. Reduced gas mileage. Because of #4, your engine needs to work harder to accelerate the car. Highway mileage, where the car remains a constant speed, will be unaffected. However mileage in stop-and-go traffic will decrease.

6. Reduced integrity of the wheel mounts. Because of #1, #3, and #4, large wheels can actually put a dangerous load on the wheel mounts- the axle, hub, ball joints, bearings, and other load bearing parts.

7. Reduced integrity of the wheel. A larger wheel can be (be is not necessarily) more fragile. This is due to a manufacturer not increasing the spoke and rim strength proportional to the increased forces exerted on the wheel. This might be done to save cost or weight. To compensate, large wheels can be forged or pressure-cast, but this makes them expensive. Even forged 19" wheels are still heavier than most inexpensive, cast 17" wheels, and not necessarily as strong.

8. Increased ride harshness. Without much sidewall on the tire, the tire can no longer absorb bumps. It will try, however- low profile tires have very soft sidewalls to compensate. A soft sidewall will tend to deform, which is one of the reasons low-profile tires tend to require wider wheels.

9. Increased chance of tire bubbles, blowouts, and/or wheel damage. Since the low-profile tire cannot absorb as much impact, the entire combination becomes more delicate. This risk is increased by running a narrow tire.

10. Decreased ride quality. Larger wheels often (but not always) increase unsprung weight. Ride quality is largely determined by the car's sprung to unsprung weight ratio, where a larger ratio is better. A car with heavy wheels will need to run softer springs (hence increasing body roll and dive) to maintain the same ride quality.

11. Price. Large wheels are expensive. Since most 19" wheels need to be forged for reasons of reliability, they can cost two to four times as much as a 16-17 inch wheel.

12. Price. Large tires are expensive to continually replace. This can amount to roughly a $150-$300 savings ever few years- that adds up! All for the exact same width of tread.

Some plus-sized wheel combinations do give excellent grip, turn-in, braking, and overall handling improvements. This is not from the larger diameter of the wheel- it is despite the larger diameter. Those attributes are best improved by purchasing stickier rubber (more aggressive tires) on WIDER wheels.

Wider Wheels:
Moving to a wider wheel on the stock diameter (16" or 17" on the Mazda6) can provide great handling improvements.
It helps the tire's sidewall gain leverage in resisting cornering forces.

To achieve the same sidewall stiffness on a car with a skinnier wheel, the air pressure must be increased. Increasing air pressure has several undesirable effects, thus it is better to gain sidewall stiffness via a wider wheel.

The Mazda6 can accommodate an 8" wide wheel.
The benefits of a wide wheel are mostly limited to handling.
Acceleration and braking may degrade slightly if the wheel's weight has risen, though to a smaller extent than it would with a larger diameter wheel.

Much like large wheels look from the side, wide wheels look tremendously imposing from behind- so it's an aesthetic upgrade too.

The Real Upgrade: Tires!
Of course, the biggest upgrade for the Mazda6 is not the wheel- it's the tire. Upgrading to a tire with softer rubber will do wonders for improving cornering grip and braking distances.

A stiffer sidewall can drastically change the handling characteristics. In short, tires can make a world of difference and get you the performance you want- often without an expensive wheel upgrade. Tires are the single biggest upgrade you can buy for the car.

In fact, the most compelling reason to buy new wheels is to mount a second set of tires on them- have a set of winter and summer tires. Or all-season and competition tires. Either way- don't skimp on tires. Ever. [Further Reading.]

Next time you a car pulls up next to you with 19's catching your eye, enjoy how nice they look. In your rear-view mirror, that is, before they disappear in the next turn.
GTS_300_Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 08:30 PM   #2
El Sucio
Regular Member
 
El Sucio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 186
Default

Probably why reasons you don't see V8 supercars (or most other forms of motorsport) running 18-19 inch wheels. They focus more on wheel width.
__________________
2002 AU III XR8 220kw

Previous Rides:
KH Laser TX3
EF Futura (RIP)
EL XR6
AU2 XR6
BA XR8
BF XR8
BF Wagon (XR6 Lookalike supercharged)
2014 Ford Ranger XLT
2000 AU XR8 with all the options boxes ticked (RIP)
2005 BA Mk 2 Fairmont Ghia V8
2012 FG Mk 2 XR6T

G.M.H. - Get a Mechanic...Hurry!!
El Sucio is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 08:37 PM   #3
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Unless the car was designed for it, more diameter = slower car.

I know some retarded people who think a 20" wheel with a super low profile tyre will give better grip and performance then their car's original 16" wheel will. No extra width either.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 08:43 PM   #4
cob115
COUPE WHORE
 
cob115's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: were ever i pass out
Posts: 2,489
Default

dont know bout tall wheels but fattys are my favorite ,xa xb xc coupes were made for them
__________________
Rides

1974 Malvern Star Dragstar pushbike mods; bald back tyre, big sissy bar, speckled paint job and buckled front wheel
cob115 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 08:50 PM   #5
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default

Depends on what car, and what driving. If you are buying 20in chromies for your falcon (or what ever) its for the bling...
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:14 PM   #6
Elks
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Elks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cob115
dont know bout tall wheels but fattys are my favorite ,xa xb xc coupes were made for them

Nothing like the sight of 305/55 15's under the back of a Falcon coupe. Next to that your 235/35 20's do look like they belong on a pulsar.
__________________
Oooh baby living in Miami....
Elks is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:18 PM   #7
Dezza
Parts bin special
 
Dezza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Narre Warren, Vic
Posts: 8,276
Default

Personally, I go for fat tyres rather than large diameter. That's why I got the SVOs. They are 7" wide on the front, 8" on the back (compared to the old 6.5" turboblades) but are only 16" in diameter. They give it a tough stance.
__________________
Weekender 1964 US Falcon Futura convertible - Rangoon Red
260 Windsor V8, 4 speed manual, LHD, Electronic ignition, Mustang wheels
https://fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11470868

Daily 2014 SZII Territory diesel - basic runabout

Previous Cars 1990 EAII Fairmont Ghia - Tickford engine, 5 speed, SVO wheels, bodykit, much more
2000 AUII Fairmont - XR wheels, Ghia interior
2010 FG XR50T ute - XR8 bonnet, Streetfighter intake
Dezza is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:19 PM   #8
Ives
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ives's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
Default

I never regretted upping my wheel size by 2". All pros, no cons. Well, more expensive tyres, but meh...
Ives is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:20 PM   #9
Nostalgia
LOW AND SLOW
 
Nostalgia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Geelong.
Posts: 2,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myts
Nothing like the sight of 305/55 15's under the back of a Falcon coupe. Next to that your 235/35 20's do look like they belong on a pulsar.
Good comeback. Some do it for performance and handling but the majority these days do it just for looks.
Nostalgia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:22 PM   #10
eXi7w0unD
Regular Member
 
eXi7w0unD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brissy!
Posts: 472
Default

its really just for show like mine!!!!! and it helps me not to speed or do wheel spins etc i dun wanna spend 325+ for tread for 1 wheel..
__________________
i won.
eXi7w0unD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:23 PM   #11
ea90gl
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ea90gl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 1,255
Default

i would have to agree on the whole enhancing look thing (provided you pick the right type), for instance when my fiance bought some 17's for her 06 lancer it looked so much better than the standard 14's with hubcaps, but the problem was it had a bumpier ride.
ea90gl is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:48 PM   #12
fourl6
AU Falcon Man
 
fourl6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gippsland
Posts: 928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ea90gl
i would have to agree on the whole enhancing look thing (provided you pick the right type), for instance when my fiance bought some 17's for her 06 lancer it looked so much better than the standard 14's with hubcaps, but the problem was it had a bumpier ride.
found that when i went from my standard 16's to BF XR 17's... but it does handle alot better around corners but i think thats the width not the height... its not any slower but i only went up 1 inch...
__________________

2015 SZ MkII Ford Territory TS
Aero Blue, RWD Petrol, Standard Sat Nav.

2013 TF Ford Kuga Ambiente
Panther Black, AWD, 6 Speed Auto, 1.6lt ecoBoost Turbo Petrol.

Was
2012 FG Mk2 Ford Falcon XR6
Swift Green,6 Speed Auto, Stock...

2001 AUIII Ford Falcon Forte
Genuine T2 TS50 bodykit, 18" BF Cobras, Boge and Eibach Suspension and Complete AU2 Fairmont Ghia Interior

1994 EF Ford Fairmont
Gun Metal Grey, Lumpy Straight 6
fourl6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 10:58 PM   #13
Barry_v
rocknrolla
 
Barry_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,589
Default

I think he is over stating a lot of the real life effects of larger wheels. most of those things would not even be able to be measured their effect would be so small.

you could equally say say that a taller wheel gives you better fuel economy because it makes your final gearing taller.
__________________
1979 P6 LTD 383c
1970 ZC Fairlane 500 351w
1964 XM Falcon Deluxe 200ci
Barry_v is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-01-2008, 11:06 PM   #14
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,704
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry_v
I think he is over stating a lot of the real life effects of larger wheels. most of those things would not even be able to be measured their effect would be so small.

you could equally say say that a taller wheel gives you better fuel economy because it makes your final gearing taller.
That's true - his base assumption is that when you go for a larger rim size, you keep the same profile tyre, thus giving a larger overall circumference. That would be both stupid and illegal. When you go for a larger RIM size, you actually go for a lower profile tyre (and he does touch on the effects of that later, so who knows what he's thinking in points 1 to 4), which results in the same (or very similar) rolling diameter and circumference.

Yes, the weight of the wheel may be an issue in terms of momentum, but it's not like a 19" wheel is twice as heavy as a 17" - there'd be a couple of KGs per wheel in it, and you can get that just between different brands of the same size anyway.

Mazda6person hasn't really thought about what he is saying, or has only thought enough about each point, but not looking at the whole picture (or wheel).
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 12:02 AM   #15
ebxr8240
Performance moderator
 
ebxr8240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St Clair..N.S.W
Posts: 14,875
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical advice. 
Default

So whats wrong with these ??? LOL...
http://www.fordforums.com.au/attachm...chmentid=38158
__________________
Real cars are not driven by front wheels,real cars lift them!!...
BABYS ARE BOTTLE FED, REAL MEN GET BLOWN.
Don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic!
Dart 330ci block turbo black pearl EBXR8 482 rwkw..
Daily driver GTE FG..
Projects http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=107711
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...8+turbo&page=4
ebxr8240 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 12:07 AM   #16
schnoods
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
schnoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 1,234
Default

I think generally they started getting bigger from 14" then 15 and so forth due to the brakes behind em.

I reckon you'd have to be crazy to have anything bigger than 17" without sporting some Serious brakes.

Go the 15" Pro Convo's.
__________________
A philosopher is a person who finds a problem for every solution . :Reverend:

95 EF XR8, Advance headers, Vortech V2 t trim blower, Ported Cobra Manifold, Capa Switch Chip Eliminator. 307 rwhp 395 ft/lb 13.2 @ 105mph

Now NA- AFR 165 heads, 1.6RR, Ported Cobra 269rwhp 14.2 ... needs stall and 4.11's

1977 CL Chrysler Panel Van, 360, 727 torqueflite auto soon to be restored.
schnoods is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 01:42 AM   #17
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ives
I never regretted upping my wheel size by 2". All pros, no cons. Well, more expensive tyres, but meh...
What exactly were the Pro's? Beside how it looks...
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 07:31 AM   #18
Disciple
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 169
Default

Anything bigger than 19" in my book is stupid. I think 18's are the perfect size, hence why you see proper Japanese fast cars (Skylines, Supras, EVOs etc) all run 17" and 18" rims. It's all to do with unsprung mass in terms of performance. Reduce the unpsrung mass means better braking, better acceleration, cornering etc. IMO, 20's on a normal sedan or whatever look retarded and only serve to make the car owner look like a complete tool who knows nothing about car dynamics. Going to larger rims almost certainly means lower profile tyres which in turns gives rubbish ride quality. Most of the time you can't even buy decent brand tyres for bigger rims, so people go with brands like "Wanli" which are simply horrible.
Disciple is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 07:35 AM   #19
LTDHO
The one and only
 
LTDHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Posts: 9,053
Default

I think 17 is about the best size, I ran these for years (v8 supers still do)

I have 20's now just for looks.
__________________
1992 DC LTDHO 360rwkw built by me
Tuned by CVE Performance
Going of the rails on a crazy train
Other cars include Dynamic ED Sprint, Dynamic DL LTD, Sparkling Burgundy DL LTD, Yellow, Red & Blue XB sedan & Black XB Coupe
LTDHO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 07:38 AM   #20
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disciple
Anything bigger than 19" in my book is stupid. I think 18's are the perfect size, hence why you see proper Japanese fast cars (Skylines, Supras, EVOs etc) all run 17" and 18" rims. It's all to do with unsprung mass in terms of performance. Reduce the unpsrung mass means better braking, better acceleration, cornering etc. IMO, 20's on a normal sedan or whatever look retarded and only serve to make the car owner look like a complete tool who knows nothing about car dynamics. Going to larger rims almost certainly means lower profile tyres which in turns gives rubbish ride quality. Most of the time you can't even buy decent brand tyres for bigger rims, so people go with brands like "Wanli" which are simply horrible.
I agree - its all about unsprung mass. People would be surprised to learn how much some of these big rims weigh.
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:19 AM   #21
Casablanca
carburettor
 
Casablanca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: your mums house
Posts: 260
Default

i like my 18" mags they look good and they are plenty wider than stock im running 265/45 rear and 255/40 front this is for the skyline.

never had a problem i run federal 595s on both front and rear so they arent really that much more expensive.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by irlewy86
HSV GTSR..... $125,000
HSV Team shirt..... $65
Tank of Fuel....$75
Being cornered by a 17 year old bogan with 2 kids and no teeth telling you how much she loves HSV's..... Priceless
Casablanca is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:27 AM   #22
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Race cars generally run 13" or 15" wheels, and by race cars I mean open wheelers. Formula 1, Formula 3, A1GP run 13" and Indycars/Champcars run 15".

Sports and prototype cars (ie Lemans) are heavier and hence need bigger diameter brakes to haul up the cars. To fit over the brakes, these cars need bigger diameter wheels. This is also why Indycars/Champcars run 15" rims compared to 13" rims on F1 cars, as the Indycars/Champcars are around 135kg heavier and don't have carbon discs.
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:29 AM   #23
xbgs351
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC
That's true - his base assumption is that when you go for a larger rim size, you keep the same profile tyre, thus giving a larger overall circumference. That would be both stupid and illegal. When you go for a larger RIM size, you actually go for a lower profile tyre (and he does touch on the effects of that later, so who knows what he's thinking in points 1 to 4), which results in the same (or very similar) rolling diameter and circumference.

Yes, the weight of the wheel may be an issue in terms of momentum, but it's not like a 19" wheel is twice as heavy as a 17" - there'd be a couple of KGs per wheel in it, and you can get that just between different brands of the same size anyway.

Mazda6person hasn't really thought about what he is saying, or has only thought enough about each point, but not looking at the whole picture (or wheel).
Ever heard of Moment of Inertia or unsprung mass?
xbgs351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:33 AM   #24
cs123
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
cs123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Morayfield
Posts: 28,251
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: Can't think of anyone more deserving. Russ Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For all the technical support behind the scenes. Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Technical submission 
Default

I think the Mazda guys was making the point that it's not the weight, it's the radius of gyration that can affect acceleration and braking performance.

As you increase the rim size you more than likely will increase the radius of gyration and this will have an affect, although I'm not sure what the real world impact is.

You also need to start looking at maintaining the strength while keeping the mass of the rim under control.
__________________
I love Holdens....
cs123 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:34 AM   #25
Dazza XLT
Back in a Ford
 
Dazza XLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Australia
Posts: 2,620
Default

I find a lot of local people around here spend far too much on large rims, and no-where near enough on fitting decent rubber.

It won't look fully sick after you lose control in the wet and smash into a kerb, because you skimped and bought crap tyres!

Personally I'd rather stick to a 16"/17"/18" rim with a decent brand of tyres.

Cheers

Darran
__________________
Back in a Ford!
2020 Ford Ranger XLT Hi Rider!
Dazza XLT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:34 AM   #26
Casablanca
carburettor
 
Casablanca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: your mums house
Posts: 260
Default

unfortunately i have to agree with the post above^^^

it also depends on what kind of use your putting them to.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by irlewy86
HSV GTSR..... $125,000
HSV Team shirt..... $65
Tank of Fuel....$75
Being cornered by a 17 year old bogan with 2 kids and no teeth telling you how much she loves HSV's..... Priceless
Casablanca is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:44 AM   #27
Mr Cube
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Mr Cube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disciple
Going to larger rims almost certainly means lower profile tyres which in turns gives rubbish ride quality. Most of the time you can't even buy decent brand tyres for bigger rims, so people go with brands like "Wanli" which are simply horrible.
I run 19" on XR6 Falcon, with Koni shocks, King Super lows set up correctly the ride quality is a firmer then stock but still comfy.. I also manage to get good tyres each time, I even had the offer of Pirelli's so I think a lot of the tyre companies are definatly making them.

I did upgrade my brakes from AUI to BA as I did notice a degrade in braking, with the stock calipers, but good pads and slotted rotors. Upgraded to BA size calipers and rotors and is is much better.

My choice was purely looks, not on track performance.
__________________
Have you got an FPV or XR6/8 and live in the ACT or surrounding area? Come and check out the FPV & XR Owners Club of ACT

AUI VCT:
To date - Big brake upgrade, Koni and Kings all round, 2.5 cat back ready for replacing, 19" again ready for replacing.

Planned - Too much now I got the baby back.
Mr Cube is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 09:46 AM   #28
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disciple
Anything bigger than 19" in my book is stupid. I think 18's are the perfect size, hence why you see proper Japanese fast cars (Skylines, Supras, EVOs etc) all run 17" and 18" rims. It's all to do with unsprung mass in terms of performance. Reduce the unpsrung mass means better braking, better acceleration, cornering etc. IMO, 20's on a normal sedan or whatever look retarded and only serve to make the car owner look like a complete tool who knows nothing about car dynamics. Going to larger rims almost certainly means lower profile tyres which in turns gives rubbish ride quality. Most of the time you can't even buy decent brand tyres for bigger rims, so people go with brands like "Wanli" which are simply horrible.
X2 I have heard that removing 1kg of unsprung mass equals about 4kg from the car. Something along those lines. Not a big fan of massive wheels anyway. I'd only go to 18" on my car if I were to upgrade at a max.

Wouldn't mind throwing some Prodrives, Work or Rays/Volk on my car but they are expensive :
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 10:17 AM   #29
dishpig
Only an xr6...
 
dishpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 539
Default

All I know is when I get bigger rims I'm keeping my 17's for the track, doesn't seem right taking 19's on a track.
__________________
Veiw my car here

TICKFORD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FPV
dishpig is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-01-2008, 10:36 AM   #30
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

My experience after many track day events is that there is NO performance gain to be had in swapping from 17 - 18' wheels on the circuit.

I had both sizes with the same tires (in the different diameter) on the car on the same day on the same track. six laps with 18's, a dozen laps with 17's.

It was not a perfect test, as the 17's had wider tires (255 compared with 245)
but the results were conclusive.

There was bugger all in it, not enough to get a difinitive better or worse result. If there's not an 'improvement' on the track, there aint no way you'll see one on the street.

Bling effect only. And 20's on street cars - ha ha, especially when they fit those piddly little 235 or 245's........ which I reckon is way out of proportion to the wheel diameter. Fit 'em up with a 285 or 295 and then we're getting serious.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL