|
14-04-2010, 07:13 PM | #61 | ||
DJ110
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Benalla
Posts: 55
|
We have just bought an 89 Maverick - petrol / gas 4.2lt, I will be towing a horse float about 11 times a year. Any idea's on fuel economy on petrol / gas ?
Please tell me it will tow well. Our mitsubishi Triton was written off for hail damage |
||
14-04-2010, 07:26 PM | #62 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,762
|
It will tow fantastic, but fuel economy out of the petrol/gas when towing is shyte to say the least
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
|
||
14-04-2010, 07:54 PM | #63 | ||||
Captain Malcolm Reynolds
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,830
|
__________________
Currently: 2014 Mazda6 GT (Daily) and 1999 Mazda MX5 (Fun Car) Previously: 2001 Ford Escape XLT; 2010 MC Mondeo; 1984 FD LTD; 2001 AU2 Falcon Forte; 2005 LS Focus Zetec; 1988 RE Colt; 1982 RB Colt; 1974 KE20 Corolla Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
14-04-2010, 07:59 PM | #64 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,762
|
Just a little over 2 years, that is not too bad - LOL
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
|
||
14-04-2010, 08:53 PM | #65 | ||
XD Sundowner
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: moranbah
Posts: 1,078
|
i have gained 10 kilos since then lol ,should be ok more about tune than anything ,no worse than most modern fourbies ,and they are still the best tow rig for your money .thats why i had 3 of them
__________________
something old something blue |
||
15-04-2010, 10:02 PM | #66 | |||
DJ110
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Benalla
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
with the 3lt triton we had I uses $130 to go from Benalla to Heathcote and back - about 300-400km I thought that was bad. We looked at a 4.2lt deisle but thought the gas would be a cheaper option for normal trips as I probably only tow 8 times a year and go no further than 1.5hrs away at the most Sorry but new to the 4wd world other than the triton |
|||
15-04-2010, 10:11 PM | #67 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,666
|
Theres a guy on this forum, or Xfalcon, I can't remember with one of these with a turbo'd Falcon I6 in it, I remember it because of his awesome looking manifold he made.
|
||
This user likes this post: |
15-04-2010, 10:22 PM | #68 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Edit: I think that was running on petrol, LPG would be a little bit more. |
|||
16-04-2010, 07:14 AM | #69 | |||
Chasing a FORD project!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide
Posts: 5,114
|
Seeing as this thread has been mined, can anyone tell me how much a mid 90's maverick would set me back?
__________________
Quote:
1996 BMW 740iL V8. TV, phone, leather, sunroof, satnav, all as standard. Now with 19" TSW Brooklands, 2 1/2" stainless steel exhaust, plus more coming soon. |
|||
16-04-2010, 08:49 AM | #70 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,343
|
$2000 for a boonga
$5000 for a decent petrol $10000 for a decent 4.2 diesel |
||
16-04-2010, 09:06 AM | #71 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,527
|
the early GQ carb versions are the dearer of the GQ range in petrol
the EFI 4.2 are a bit more fuel friendly,but not much 20++l per 100klm is about the norm for these LPG do use more than fuel(30% more ??),but its cheaper to buy they are a terrific towing rig,and for a 3 tonne lump the 4.2 can get em moving quite well the early maverick are carb for price, well i think ZA 289 is pritty close but youll pay upwards of 10k for a late 4.2 EFI (97) |
||
16-04-2010, 09:38 AM | #72 | |||
the age of
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: in the sky
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
It was a great car |
|||
16-04-2010, 09:51 AM | #73 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Having lived with one for a few years, I cannot see the value in them. Spend 4 grand on a decent EL wagon and you will have a vastly vastly (vastly) better car. And whenever you need a low range 4wd, go down to AVIS and spend 80 bucks a day on a brand new turbo diesel Patrol. |
|||
16-04-2010, 11:21 AM | #74 | ||
the age of
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: in the sky
Posts: 59
|
Each to their own
|
||
16-04-2010, 11:52 AM | #75 | |||
Chasing a FORD project!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide
Posts: 5,114
|
If you are going 4x4ing, who in their right state of mind would pick an EL wagon over a Maverick..??
__________________
Quote:
1996 BMW 740iL V8. TV, phone, leather, sunroof, satnav, all as standard. Now with 19" TSW Brooklands, 2 1/2" stainless steel exhaust, plus more coming soon. |
|||
16-04-2010, 11:52 AM | #76 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
Dont get me wrong though, probably nothing better out their for the price. More commenting on 4wds on general I suppose. |
|||
16-04-2010, 01:30 PM | #77 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,527
|
being a 4x4 owner i cant see how u can compare an EL falcon to a nissan patrol
mine doesnt do much of road as such (have others for that)it was mainly bought for its towing capabilities the only other 4x4 that comes close to the nissan patrol in the gq range would be the 80 series land cruiser, but their reputation commandes higher prices i think the market is who determines the price u pay for anything but each to their own |
||
17-11-2013, 04:00 PM | #78 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 121
|
I owned a 1993 GQ patrol TI in 5 speed manual and fuel economy was phenomenal. 100 litre LPG tank under the car and 75 litre ULP tank. Combined range was 1400 km as I didn't fill up on a trip from Canberra to toowoomba. Filled her up when I hit the Sunshine Coast. Tune it properly and it will return great fuel economy. Forget big carbs and the likes...there is where the fuel goes. It had hurricane header and 3 inch exhaust and not much else done to it. Religiously serviced every 5000km without fail.
Brother now owns it and is still going great...and with 600000km on it now. Can't kill them and looking at buying a SWB maverick in the next few days. Look after them and they will go forever! |
||
17-11-2013, 07:55 PM | #79 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Quote:
I don't know about the diesel, but the petrol versions have an appetite for heads and head gaskets no matter how well they are looked after, which is typical of Nissan as they couldn't design an engine without some sort of inherent fault to save themselves - look at all the dramas with the ZD30 for example. Despite their size they are very cramped inside. The front seats dont slide back far enough and legroom in the rear is just about non existent. They are also one of the most unsafe vehicles on the road today. No crumple zones, no airbags, wafer thin pillars and doors without intrusion bars. If off road use is your main priority then by all means go for it, but don't get sucked in by the hype - imo they definitely leave a lot to be desired. |
|||
17-11-2013, 08:20 PM | #80 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
|
|||
18-11-2013, 01:14 AM | #81 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,027
|
|
||