Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2014, 07:03 PM   #31
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,989
Default Re: Cubic inches

Quote:
Originally Posted by noflac52 View Post
Facts
and the inernertz is full of em ey

now off you go and google stuff
pottery beige is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-06-2014, 08:18 PM   #32
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default Re: Cubic inches

Quote:
Originally Posted by MethodX View Post
Then you have the 348 and 409 big blocks. The w heads, Which were available until the mid 60's
Shes so fine my 409.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by noflac52
All of the engine displacement, deck height etc stuff is not really relevant. Its the weight of the block. You have to compare apples with apples and in the sixties and seventies they were made of cast iron and the big blocks weighed more than the small blocks hence big blocks, small blocks.
We aren't talking about engines here for those who will come back and say such and such engine weighs more than such and such engine. We are talking about blocks.

If a bigger displacement of more than 400cu in or so was required a bigger block was cast to build a bigger engine. With todays technology big block/ small block isn't as defined as it was then.
read the above post, wedge block are from 348 (5.7L) to 427 (7.0L) they are big blocks (rat). the 409 is the rearest of all the big blocks.
the W427 is a small block (mouse).

the mouse block typically goes to 511 cid due to bore spacing.
as the rat block goes to 810 cid, most common 727 cid,,, some custom billet mill now go to 1000+ cid
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 09-06-2014, 11:00 PM   #33
MethodX
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MethodX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,198
Default Re: Cubic inches

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnz View Post
read the above post, wedge block are from 348 (5.7L) to 427 (7.0L) they are big blocks (rat). the 409 is the rearest of all the big blocks.
the W427 is a small block (mouse).

the mouse block typically goes to 511 cid due to bore spacing.
as the rat block goes to 810 cid, most common 727 cid,,, some custom billet mill now go to 1000+ cid
The 348, 409 and one special version of the 427 are big blocks, W head.
Early series, available up to the mid 60's

Then Chevrolet bought out the Gen IV big block- 396, 402, 427,454... the rat.
MethodX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-06-2014, 09:43 AM   #34
noflac52
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
noflac52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: central coast nsw
Posts: 1,733
Default Re: Cubic inches

For those who couldn't grasp the first post.

Small block = small
Big block = big
The word piston describes pistons
the word head describes heads
the word crankshaft describes crankshafts
the word block describes block.

Manufactures during the horsepower race stretched the small blocks as far as they could with boring and stroking, deck heights etc and this generally occurred at around the 400 cube mark before it became more expensive and a degree of unreliability set in to keep developing them further. They achieved easy cheap horsepower and torque from an engine with bigger displacement with a higher degree of reliability. The big block.
With todays technology these kinds of figures can be easily achieved in smaller engines that stay together.

It wasn't done so that car enthusiasts could brag that they have the biggest engine it was done to win at the track and sell more cars for the cheapest manufacturing costs.

All the manufacturers did it and they all had their different designs. You can't generally bolt items from one manufacturers big block onto another manufacturers block or heads and other stuff from small blocks onto big blocks but the one thing they generally had in common was that they weighed more than the small blocks and of course they were actually bigger.

Its as simple as that ! The big blocks were bigger than the small blocks and the cut off point for reliability and cost was around the 400 cube mark.

Once the block is cast you can make it smaller displacement than 400 cubes with the crank and rods etc but it is still a big block.

The term big block describes the block castings!
noflac52 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL