|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-07-2014, 03:01 PM | #1 | ||
Powered by Marshall
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,143
|
I note the new Jaguar F type R has a 5.0 supercharged V8 producing 404kw.
Magically that is what FPV claim from their 5.0 supercharged V8. Almost identical Does anyone know technically how close these engines are? I note no one has any issue with Jaguar quoting 404kw form a blown 5.0. However when FPV did it the world stopped and it was scrutinised to within an inch of its life. I'd be interested to hear from anyone who knows the tech specs and can expalin the similarities or disparities of these two engines.
__________________
Powered by Marshall |
||
16-07-2014, 03:04 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,025
|
They arnt related at all.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
16-07-2014, 03:05 PM | #3 | ||
Lukeyson
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,584
|
Very good question. The AJ-V8 Gen III was developed under Ford's watch wasn't it, and the Miami came along not long afterwards.
It really does make you wonder how much of one went into the other. Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it. |
||
16-07-2014, 03:09 PM | #4 | |||
Powered by Marshall
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
I just wonder what the tech specs of the two engines are and if they are similar
__________________
Powered by Marshall |
|||
16-07-2014, 03:58 PM | #5 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,801
|
http://www.imakenews.com/jaguarplano....cfm?x=b11,0,w
Dual VVT and direct injected for starters and I'm pretty sure they're intercooled too. Also Jaguar arn't claiming anything about over-boost so the 404 kw rating is good for all conditions. I think the compressdion ratio's are similar. Other than that IIRC the marketing blurb that came out when the SC engine was launched here claimed it had over 40% Austrlaian made content that was unique to the the engine here. |
||
This user likes this post: |
16-07-2014, 04:50 PM | #6 | |||
Long live the GT !
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 1,863
|
Quote:
Doesn't look good for the HSV guys having a V8 from the blue team that's 20% smaller in cubic capacity yet making very similar power.. Anyways, both motors have similar capacities (Miami 4951cc vs Jag 5000cc) and almost identical bore and stroke specs. Also interesting to note the early Jag blown 5.0's made 380kW/625Nm, pretty much the same as the BOSS 335's..
__________________
2018 Ford Mustang GT - Oxford White | Auto | Herrod Tune | K&N Filter | StreetFighter Oil Separators | H&R Springs | Whiteline Vertical Links | Ceramic Protection | Tint "Whatya think of me car, XR Falcon, 351 Blown Cleveland running Motec injection and runnin' on methanol... goes pretty hard too, got heaps of torque for chucking burnouts, IT'S UNREAL !!" - Poida
|
|||
17-07-2014, 01:05 AM | #7 | ||
Turbo 358W
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: bosnia(boronia)
Posts: 618
|
the Miami/coyote is a modular series engine and a evolution of the 4.6l but with new heads, bigger bore, more stroke, I would say the jag v8 is unique to jaguar/ landrover
|
||
17-07-2014, 08:25 AM | #8 | ||
Powered by Marshall
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,143
|
Ok so what I'm gleaning here is that technically they are not close at all.
Thanks for the replies guys
__________________
Powered by Marshall |
||
17-07-2014, 01:40 PM | #9 | ||
Turbo 358W
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: bosnia(boronia)
Posts: 618
|
|
||
17-07-2014, 02:48 PM | #10 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,334
|
They're both very different engines but Jaguar did get one bit of the tech from the Coyote- the cam-torque actuated VCT. That's not to say they have the same cam phasers or anything, just that they use the same VCT actuation concept developed by Ford. I understand it allows for a more complete function at low RPM when there isn't much oil pressure/flow available.
|
||
18-07-2014, 06:01 AM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 954
|
I believe the Coyote and Jag engine both share the same bore spacings and a few other common design principles Even though parts may not interchange.
__________________
Current Rides: XA GT Manual XBGT Manual XC GXL 1982 XE S-Pac V8 2011 F6 Velvet 2011 GT Manual Black/Gold 2020 GT500KR FG-X Sprint F150 Shelby |
||
18-07-2014, 09:39 AM | #12 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 180
|
|
||
18-07-2014, 09:44 AM | #13 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
Quote:
They do both have near square bore/stroke ratios though |
|||